AI Product Engineering · End to End

From days of due diligence to a cited risk report in minutes

VaultIQ+ is the AI due-diligence platform we designed, built, and operate for InsightX. An analyst enters a person of interest; minutes later they have a structured risk report across eleven categories, with every claim linked to its source.

VaultIQ+Built for InsightXRegTech / compliance intelligence
Days → Minutes
Research time per subject
11
Risk categories per report
100%
Findings cited to source
vaultiq.app
Report ready
Overall risk signalMedium
Litigation history
Medium
Watchlists & sanctions
Clear
Adverse media
Elevated
Regulatory issues
Clear
Source 1 Source 2
11
Specialised AI agents
6+
Licensed data sources
Minutes
From search to report
Full
Audit trail on every report

Overview

A complete due-diligence platform, not a chatbot

A compliance officer enters a person of interest. Minutes later, VaultIQ+ returns a structured risk report across eleven categories, from litigation history and sanctions exposure to adverse media and political connections.

Every summary links back to the original evidence, so an analyst can verify any claim before acting on it. The human stays in control of the decision; the AI does the heavy reading. And it is a complete SaaS product (identity, roles, billing, PDF export) built to the standard a regulated enterprise buyer expects.

Who it serves

  • Compliance & AML teams
  • KYC and due-diligence analysts
  • Risk & onboarding functions
  • Anyone vetting a person before they transact

What we owned, end to end

Product strategy & UXMulti-tenant SaaS backendApplied AI & agent engineeringCloud architecture & data engineeringIdentity, security & DevOps

The Challenge

The bottleneck was never the information. It was reading it

A due-diligence specialist has to learn everything publicly knowable about a person, fast, and in a format another professional will trust. In practice that meant toggling between ten data sources, copy-pasting findings into a document, and hoping nothing slipped through.

Days per file

A single thorough background report could take a senior analyst one to several days of manual research.

Inconsistent quality

Depth and presentation varied by analyst and by how much time the deadline allowed.

The “did we miss something” risk

With evidence scattered across separate subscriptions, no one could be certain a material finding wasn’t overlooked.

Senior time on junior work

Expensive specialists spent their best hours assembling documents instead of making judgement calls.

Outcomes

What changed for InsightX

These are the platform’s design guarantees, not marketing estimates.

Days → Minutes
Research turnaround

A report that took a senior analyst one to several days now arrives in minutes.

11 categories
Consistent every time

The same structured coverage across every subject, regardless of analyst or deadline.

100% cited
Verifiable findings

Every AI summary links back to the primary evidence, defensible to a regulator.

Analyst → decision-maker
Higher-value work

Specialists stop assembling documents and start making judgement calls.

How It Works

Three coordinated layers, running in parallel

When a search is submitted, the work fans out across three layers in parallel: a deterministic retrieval layer, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) index, and a multi-agent reasoning fleet. A slow data source never holds up the rest of the report.

01

Deterministic data acquisition

Court records, sanctions and watchlists, news archives, government records, and KYC data are retrieved deterministically, each in its own pipeline. The evidence is real and traceable, never generated by the model.

02

Knowledge indexing (RAG)

Returned documents become a private, per-search retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) index, so each agent can pull exactly the evidence it needs.

03

Multi-agent reasoning & synthesis

Eleven specialised AI agents (one per risk category), coordinated by a multi-agent orchestration layer, turn that evidence into findings: a summary, a risk signal, and citations back to the source.

Search submitted
Data acquisition
Knowledge index
11 agents
Report assembled
Delivered & notified

Event-driven and orchestrated in the cloud: every step independently observable, retryable, and parallel.

The Agent Fleet

Eleven specialised agents, not one giant prompt

Each agent has one narrow job, its own sources, and its own quality checks, so any category can be improved without touching the others. Every finding ships with the evidence behind it.

A final step assembles the eleven findings and an executive summary into the report the analyst reads, then notifies the right people the moment it’s ready.

Adverse media

Elevated

Cited sources

News archive · 2021
Court record · 2019
Red flagsLitigation historyWatchlists & sanctionsRegulatory issuesAdverse mediaPolitical connectionsCorporate connectionsEthics & conductIntegritySocial media presenceSponsored & paid content

Continuous Improvement

The system gets sharper, under the client’s control

InsightX’s own experts steer report quality over time. No code, and no change reaches production unmeasured.

Experts correct the AI, not engineers

The client’s experts flag an issue on any report section, propose a fix, and roll it out, all in-app. No engineers needed.

Every change is measured before it ships

Each proposed change is scored against a benchmark of verified reports before it goes live, and any version can be rolled back.

In the client’s voice from day one

InsightX’s own reports are built in as examples, so output matches their structure and tone from the first report.

Nothing is a black box

For any report, you can see exactly which evidence, instructions, and examples produced each finding.

vaultiq.app / ai-tutoring
Topics
Red flags
Litigation
Sanctions
Adverse media
Regulatory
Litigation · prompt v4Pending review
Quality vs. ground-truth corpus
94%
Accuracy
100%
Format
97%
Consistency
Approve & activate
Roll back

The tutoring loop

Observe
Triage
Draft revision
Evaluate vs. corpus
Approve
Activate / roll back

Client Feedback

At InsightX, we have been very fortunate to work with ObjectSingle Technologies and I cannot recommend them highly enough. They developed, from scratch, a secure platform with associated CMS for our reports and we are delighted with it. Always professional, responsive and friendly.

Justin Williams

Co-CEO (Product), InsightX

ObjectSingle has worked with us on the development of an editorial management platform and client interface. From initial brainstorming to the delivery of the final product, they worked as an integral part of our team. Always proactive, responsive, and available for support.

Veronica Ferrari

Head of Insight, InsightX

Beyond VaultIQ+

The same architecture solves a whole class of problems

Wherever a knowledge worker is paid to read everything publicly knowable and produce a defensible recommendation, the VaultIQ+ pattern applies.

KYB & vendor onboarding

Multi-source data fusion and AI summarisation, applied to corporate entities instead of people.

M&A & investment research

An agent fleet over filings, news, patents, and ESG sources.

Insurance underwriting

Agents that read submissions, policy documents, and prior claims into a risk assessment the underwriter can act on.

Legal discovery & contract review

Section-level summaries with citation back to the exact clause.

Internal knowledge platforms

“Ask the AI, get cited evidence” over your own document repositories.

Common Questions

What buyers ask us about building AI like this

We never let the model be the source of truth. A deterministic retrieval layer pulls evidence from real data sources, then retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) keeps the AI grounded in that evidence: it only summarises and structures it, and every claim cites the document it came from. In a compliance setting, an uncited “finding” simply doesn’t ship.

Have a knowledge-worker bottleneck worth automating?

If your specialists spend their best hours reading documents instead of making decisions, the architecture behind VaultIQ+ likely applies. Let’s map it to your problem.

Fully credited toward your build
NDA available
Yours to keep either way